#Chris hau pc install
#Chris hau pc software
#Chris hau pc Pc
#Chris hau pc plus

His tear-down video was entertaining, but his assertion that Apple 'lied' is blatantly untrue, and he's effectively telling people that if they buy a Mac Studio they'll be able to install their own storage. By his own account, he's uploading about six videos a week, which is part of the reason why I have trouble making sense of them and at this point avoid him and his channel. I think he's a carny barker, flooding YouTube with videos. Look at the number of comments on his YouTube videos about how Max 'tells is like it is' - unlike others, of course. I guess that's how he hopes to get to a million subscribers, which he now talks about repeatedly. He's trying to carve out a niche as an Apple Fan/Bad Boy, and now he's trying to portray himself as more honest than other reviewers without using names, to wit Dave Lee and Marques Brownlee. Personally, I don't take Max Yuryev seriously and I don't take anything that he says at face value.

#Chris hau pc software

Comes down to software I think and how it uses the resource. The 3090 has almost twice the CUDA cores of the 3070 and the 3070 is 50% faster than the Ultra in these tests and twice as fast as the Max.

#Chris hau pc Pc

For the tests so far I am not sure the Ultra is as good a deal as the Max and if you want real performance you may still be better off with a PC workstation with 3090 etc. Power consumed, then Mac clearly has an advantage but if shear performance is needed I still expect a similarly priced PC workstation to beat the Ultra. It will come down to specific work flows I think. It will be even more with the 3080 or 3090. For software that uses CUDA this is a big difference in performance. the-price/īut NVIDIA still has the lead by a long way even for the 3070. The Mac Studio shows us exactly why Apple left Intel behind: Īn Apple monitor where '5k' doesn't describe the price.

#Chris hau pc plus

Antivirus software, ASLR and all the other security mitigations are useless.'ĭomas has put all his research, plus tools to check whether your VIA C3 CPU might have an undocumented coprocessor and to disable the coprocessor by default, up on his GitHub page at. Some of the VIA C3 x86 processors have God Mode enabled by default. 'Fortunately, we still need ring 0 access to start the launch process, right?' Domas asked.

After three weeks, he had 15 GB of log data - and the instructions to flip on the backdoor in the hidden RISC chip.

He even built a testing rig consisting of seven Nehemiah-based thin clients hooked up to a power relay that would power-cycle the machines every couple of minutes, because his fuzzing attempts would usually crash the systems. Then he collected many old VIA C3 machines and spent weeks fuzzing code. He found one - US8341419 - that mentioned jumping from ring 3 to ring 0 and protecting the machine from exploits of model-specific registers (MSRs), manufacturer-created commands that are often limited to certain chipsets.ĭomas followed the 'trail of breadcrumbs,' as he put it, from one patent to another and figured out that certain VIA chipsets were covered by the patents. 'These backdoors probably exist elsewhere.'ĭomas discovered the backdoor, which exists on VIA C3 Nehemiah chips made in 2003, by combing through filed patents. 'These black boxes that we're trusting are things that we have no way to look into,' he said. The bad news is that it's entirely possible that such hidden backdoors exist on many other chipsets. The good news is that, as far as Domas knows, this backdoor exists only on VIA C3 Nehemiah chips made in 2003 and used in embedded systems and thin clients. 'It's a secret, co-located core buried alongside the x86 chip.